Pages

7.1.12

Google+ hits 2.6m UK visitors, 66.7m worldwide


The figures, which do not include visits via mobile, show that Google's recently launched social networking site ranked the UK as the seventh-highest country in terms of monthly visitors, close behind Japan, but falling some way short of Euro territories France and Germany, and emerging markets Brazil and India.
Worldwide traffic for the site in November was 66.7 million unique visitors, with 14.7 million of those coming from the top territory, the US.
Google+ recorded its second-highest traffic from internet users in India for that period, with 4.3 million unique visits, followed by Brazil with 3.6 million uniques, Germany with 3.4 million and France with 3.4 million.
Its UK traffic is still a long way from rivalling Facebook, however, with that site receiving 32.3 million unique visits in November. Twitter, meanwhile, received 8.7 million uniques for the same period, according to comScore.
Google+ launched in September last year as the search giant moved to secure its place among rivals in the burgeoning social media space. It expanded the service to brands in November.
At its last public count in October 2011, Google claimed to have 40 million users of the social network worldwide.
However three months later, analyst Paul Allen was widely reported after predicting Google+ had 62 million users, and was achieving a rate of new signups of 625,000 per day
Google has recently started to roll out a new search homepage, as part of ongoing design changes to its services and products, to create a brand consistency online.
Countries with largest Google+ audience (in millions)


Google+ audience

LocationTotal unique visitors (000)In millions
World-Wide66,75666.7
1United States14,73914.7
2India4,2604.3
3Brazil3,6263.6
4Germany3,3823.4
5France3,3613.4
6Japan2,6372.6
7United Kingdom2,5872.6
8Canada2,5622.6
9Turkey1,8261.8
10Spain1,5961.6
11Italy1,2741.3
12Russia1,2401.2
13Poland1,0641.1
14Mexico1,0021
 Follow Adarsh vijay on  Google+

6.1.12

Google to Offer Free Tablets?


Google is going to be offering their own tablet soon, including DigiTimes which said, "As Google reportedly may launch an own-brand tablet PC to compete against Apple's iPad, sources from Google's upstream supply chain believe that Google, instead of Apple, may actually be targeting Amazon's 7-inch Kindle Fire as its major competitor."

The Amazon Kindle Fire had torrid sales for the Christmas holiday season, certainly earning its "Fire" moniker. You can't go wrong with a $199 tablet device that surfs the web, runs apps, and consumes entertainment content using Amazon Prime, which features a Netflix-like streaming service in addition to Amazon's other paid digital content - e-books, music, etc. Amazon gambled consumers would consume paid content to recoup their losses and it has paid off handsomely.

This purported Nexus tablet will come with a 7" display, run Android's latest Ice Cream Sandwich and will be priced under $199 to undercut even the mighty Amazon Kindle Fire. What is Google thinking? They're thinking the same thing Amazon is thinking - take a loss on the hardware and subsidize the cost of the tablet by selling digital content, such as movies, books, and music. The Kindle Fire costs $250 to manufacture, so it's roughly a $50 loss for Amazon. Amazon could take an even deeper loss if they wanted to, since Amazon Prime users could easily spend $50 in apps, music, and movies the first day they buy the device.

That's why I think Google should just give away their "rumored" Nexus tablet for free and subsidize it with content. They've got the cash to do it and could instantly build up the largest tablet userbase overnight. Of course, Google's foray into digital content has been bumpy. Their music offering, Google Music hasn't exactly taken off. I know one person that has tried it and wasn't much of a fan. So if Google were to offer free tablets, they'd have to revamp their digital entertainment content.

Right now, the kings of digital media are Netflix and Amazon, with HBO a smaller player in their own right. Amazon Prime is in 'prime' position to undercut everybody, including Netflix. Amazon has already inked deals with Hollywood for content. so Amazon is really ramping up their digital media content to complement their popular online store which sells traditional entertainment media such as CDs, DVDs, Blurays, and books - not to mention tools, kitchen appliances, lawnmowers, software - you name it!

Google on the other hand is a search engine with some other useful properties that aren't nearly as profitable, such as Google Voice, Gmail, and Google+. Sure, their Android operating system is kicking butt and giving them a revenue stream, but Google currently can't compete with Amazon with all the deals Amazon has with suppliers, Hollywood studios, etc.

Sure, Google can ink similar deals. In fact, Google has already set aside $100 million to bankroll their video entertainment business, but is it enough? But is it enough? I say no. One big reason is Amazon could offer special deals. For instance, "Buy this Bluray from Amazon for $24.99 and we'll throw in a free Amazon Prime streaming version of this movie, so you don't have to wait for your Bluray to arrive!" How is Google going to compete with that?

5.1.12

Google Disciplines Itself in Chrome Browser PageRank Controversy


Google is giving itself the digital equivalent of 100 lashes by downgrading the search result ranking of the company's own web browser, Google Chrome, for 60 days, The decision came about Google Chrome for compensation. The practice of creating sponsored posts with thee primary intent of gaming search result runs afoul of Google's website quality guidelines

So, just as Google would do with any other company that broke its rules, the search giant punished Chrome's site ranking in Google search results--known as a site's PageRank. Punishing its own Web browser may make up for Google's faux pas in the eyes of the media and may even make Google employees feel that their company is doing the right thing. But for the average user, Google's self-flagellation makes it harder to find and download Chrome, even if you're specifically searching for the popular Web browser.

Here is the Google PageRank Debacle Back Story

Google reportedly bought online video ads from a digital media agency called Essence Digital. Essence then reportedly hired another company called Unruly to carry out Google's video ad campaign, according to Search Engine Land. The end result was that a number of blogs wrote positive posts (with the video embedded) about Google Chrome for compensation--the reward was apparently Amazon gift cards, SEL said in a separate report.
Google doesn't specifically state it will punish a site's PageRank for creating sponsored posts. The problems start when paid posts start linking back to the sponsored website--in this casewww.google.com/chrome.
Links pointing to a specific site are one of the primary ways that Google judges a site's PageRank. The more links a site has pointing at it, the thinking goes, the higher quality it must be. Let's say Acme company is paying for bloggers to link to acmecompany.com. Google could see those paid links and determine that acmecompany.com was a popular site on the Web and thus increase its PageRank.


In reality, however, the fictitious company I made up to illustrate a point, Acme, was artificially boosting its Google ranking to attract more customers. To fight against this type of abuse, Google's own watchdog team says it will penalize a site's PageRank if it is caught participating in a paid link scheme. Last February, for example, Google downgraded department store retailer, JC Penney afterThe New York Times uncovered an apparent paid link scheme. JC Penney denied any direct knowledge of the PageRank efforts claiming a third-party was involved.

Google Puts Itself in the Crosshairs

In Chrome's case, the decision to downgrade the browser's PageRank appears to be more about the principle of paid links than actual misdeeds. Matt Cutts, Google's chief webspam fighter, said his team found only one paid link pointing back to Chrome's landing page, hardly enough to affect Google's search results.
Nevertheless, that one link violates Google's quality guidelines so now it is a little bit harder to find and download Google Chrome using a Google search. In my tests, Google.com/Chrome ranks on Google's fourth page of results for the search term "web browser" and the sixth page for "browser." Chrome typically ranks on the first page for both results.
Do Consumers Win With Remedy?
The annoying problem starts when a user searches for "Chrome" or "Google Chrome." In those cases, the first result is currently a Google support page called "Download and install Google Chrome" instead of the typical first result, Google.com/Chrome. So instead of a top search result that gets you directly to where you want to go, you end up on a help page that has a second link you have to click to get to the page you really want.
Two mouse clicks (plus a little bit of reading to find the link you want) may not be such a big deal, but it is adds another hassle for users in what should be a relatively easy process. I suppose Google was in a difficult position with this choice. If the company penalizes Chrome, then users will have a slightly harder time using Google search. But if the company doesn't penalize Chrome it will be accused of hypocrisy, or worse, favoring its own sites at a time when federal regulators are looking at Google as a potential antitrust target.
So for the next 60 days users will have to muddle through a slightly less useful Google search result in the name of fairness. Unless, of course, your primary search engine is Microsoft Bing where the current top search result for "chrome" and "google chrome" is currently, Google.com/Chrome.

4.1.12

Google's Chrome poised to become world's most popular web browser this year

Google's fast, simple Chrome browser will move ahead of Microsoft's Internet Explorer by the end of this year if current trends continue, according to research from research firm StatCounter

Over the past year, Internet Explorer fell from 46 per cent of the worldwide market to 38.5 per cent. In the same period, Google Chrome rose from 15.68 per cent to 27.27 per cent, overtaking rival Firefox in the process.

 
Over the past year, Internet Explorer fell from 46 per cent of the worldwide market to 38.5 per cent. In the same period, Chrome rose from 15.68 per cent to 27.27 per cent, overtaking rival Firefox in the process

One version of Chrome - Chrome 15 - is already the world's most popular browser, according to research released by Statcounter on December 15.

But taken together, all versions of Internet Explorer are still ahead of Google's sleek Chrome browser.The open-source browser Firefox was widely expected to take Internet Explorer's crown, but recent versions have been bloated and slow. 

Over the course of 2011, Firefox's market share has dipped from 30.68 to 25.27 per cent. The browser climbed slightly in December, but the overall trend is definitely downwards.

Over the past year, Internet Explorer use has fallen steadily, while Chrome has risen from 15 per cent to 27 per cent of the global market. Google's browser is poised to become the world's most popular
The Irish research firm's Global Stats report shows Chrome's share of the worldwide market is up from 4.66 per cent in November 2009. 

StatCounter CEO Aodhan Cullen said after Chrome overtook Firefox: 'We can look forward to a fascinating battle between Microsoft and Google as the pace of growth of Chrome suggests that it will become a real rival to Internet Explorer globally.

Mr Cullen noted that his company measures usage, not just downloads of the browser, which he said in a blog post 'show(s) that people are actually using it to access the web.'

StatCounter Global Stats are based on aggregate data collected on a sample exceeding 15billion page views per month (4billion from the US) from the StatCounter network of more than three million websites.

The Chrome browser has swiftly picked up users since Google officially released it to the public in December 2008 - much later than its rivals Firefox (2004), Apple's Safari (2003) and Internet Explorer (1995) were released.

3.1.12

Downfall of Orkut and Focus on Google Plus


Orkut a Social networking web portal from Google had tenterhooks on the user base; a million registrations in just few days- such was its clout. Although still prevalent in Brazil, it has failed to garner the numbers over rest of the world.

The widespread acceptance of Facebook among users could be the onset of its plummet, apart from other setbacks such as poor user interface: there were many frustrations over the Orkut page's layout designs and of a buggy interface. One of the key concerns for Orkut subscribers was the privacy setting: it lacked the Facebook's visibility option; hence all users could access the profile pages. Web pages crawled while crashes were frequent, while the network was flooded with spiraling new sign ups. 


On a trail to understand the reason for Orkut's diminutive presence over the years, we find that there was a dearth of business apps integrated within Orkut. In Addition, games were clearly slow, while the Facebook has blazing speeds on games such as Farmville among numerous flash games. The seamless integration of Facebook with Mobile devices was an instant success; especially, the intriguing apps for the hand held gadgets.


Furthermore, in India the Facebook features in ad campaigns regularly on radios and service providers such as Airtel and Aircel. The Orkut could have been a little cautious in mitigating the drawbacks. Nevertheless, after it shutdown the social networking site, Google Buzz in December 2011, its all set for a comeback with Google Plus.

According to Douglas Edwards, Google's long associated and former employee, the Google Plus could be a wildfire as he writes in his book: "I'm Feeling Lucky: The Confessions of Google Employee Number 59", illustrating some of the candid views over his impact and experiences in Google. In his book, when he was asked whether Larry and Sergey were really bright, he says, "I can't speak to their IQs, but I saw with my own eyes that their vision burned so brightly that it scorched everything that stood in its way."

The Google plus, though still in beta stage, looks captivating with some cool features such as "Bragging rights", "Circles". More importantly, the easy access from Gmail window coupled with a simple interface could be the game changers for Google. 

2.1.12

Google Stalking – Get over it!!


Prevent Google tracking with Disconnect add-ons for Firefox & Chrome


Whether you are Googling for Rebecca Black or for The Global Greenhouse Report, all your searches are being tracked and taken into account irrespective of you being Black, White or Green. When a user Google’s to find out things on the Web, Google uses the user’s Web searches to create a profile of the user based on the user’s previous searches which happens on all of Google websites such as Google Search, Google Plus or Maps, and also on third party websites which make use of Google Adsense, Analytics or other Google widgets and scripts. Google’s Search History feature, which was switched on as a default option was later renamed Web History to reflect how it has expanded to track what Google users do as they surf the web. For those who consider privacy a top priority this could be a pain to deal with.  

Google Disconnect & NoScript to the Rescuse

Programs have been developed to curtail Google’s untoward stalking so that users who do not want to be tracked can maintain their privacy on the internet by installing these add-on's that disable the tracking.Users of Firefox web browser can do away with the tracking with NoScript add-on or Google Disconnect the disconnect extension for the Google Chrome web browser too. The add-on was created by Brian Kennish, who also built the Facebook Disconnect extension that blocks website communication with Facebook. 

Google Disconnect blocks communication to the Google servers and the Firefox add-on blocks Google scripts like Google Adsense, Analytics and Google+ running on the websites while Google Mail continues to work as before. Being in its basic form, neither does it give a list of the services that it blocks nor any visual indication that the scripts have been blocked. Options to block only select scripts are missing as well. Google Disconnect can be downloaded and installed from the official Mozilla add-on library.

1.1.12

Google beats Facebook, Yahoo! as top 2012



Google was the most visited US web brand in 2011, defeating social networking site Facebook and rival internet giants Yahoo! and Microsoft to gain the top spot.

An average of 153.4 million people in the US visited Google sites per month in the US from January to October, making it the leading internet brand in the country, said market researcher Nielsen in its end-of-year recap.

Facebook ranked second with an average of 137.6 million visitors per month, narrowly beating Yahoo!, which saw an average of 130.1 million visitors to its sites each month.

Recently released statistics from data intelligence company Experian Hitwise found Facebook to be both the most searched for term and the most visited website in 2011. According to Experian Hitwise facebook.com accounted for 10.29 per cent of all US visits from January to November 2011, while google.com ranked second and accounted for 7.70 per cent of all US visits.

Facebook also held an overwhelming lead over other competitors in the category of top US Social Networks & Blogs according to Nielsen, drawing more than three times the number of monthly visitors than its closest challenger, Google’s blogging platform Blogger, which saw an average of 45.7 million visitors per month.

Microblogging site Twitter.com ranked third with 23.6 million unique visitors and was followed by blogging platform WordPress.com (20.4 million visitors), aging social music network Myspace.com (17.9 million visitors), business-focused social network LinkedIn (17.0 million visitors) and blogging platform Tumblr (10.9 million visitors).

Reports that Google’s newly launched social network, Google+, was dying in the months after it launched due to a lack of visitors to the network proved to be untrue. The social network managed to climb into eighth place on the list with an average of 8.2 million visitors per month, narrowly beating Yahoo!’s (discontinued as of December 1) social networking aggregation service Yahoo! Pulse (8.0 million visitors) and Six Apart’s blogging service TypePad (7.8 million visitors). — AFP/Relaxnews

Top US web brands in 2011:

   1. Google

   2. Facebook

   3. Yahoo!

   4. MSN/WindowsLive/Bing

   5. YouTube

   6. Microsoft

   7. AOL Media Network

   8. Wikipedia

   9. Apple

  10. Ask Search Network

Top 10 US social networks & blogs

   1. Facebook

   2. Blogger

   3. Twitter.com

   4. WordPress.com

   5. Myspace.com

   6. LinkedIn

   7. Tumblr

   8. Google+

   9. Yahoo! Pulse

  10. Six Apart TypePad